I love my 7mm RM (what the AI is trying to be) but would go with the 30 caliber using a 165 Barnes TTSX and be good for everything out to 500 without a worry. The heaviest I went with my 7mm WSM was a 168gr berger classic hunter that basically needed to be loaded out to max SAAMI. Just like with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester, 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, and 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, the .338 Win Mag is significantly longer than the 325 WSM. for all your hard work. The logical bottom end for the .300 Winchester ranges between 130 and 150 grains, depending on bullet construction; the 7mm Rem. Or are you wanting to increase your moose hunting skills? One of the most accurate rifles that I ever shot was a 30BR using a 118 grain bullet with crap for a BC. Put your favourite caliber, rifle make or saying on it. Same weight bullet, same velocity = same recoil. i think that its amazing that you guys are out there dissing the 7mm. But can't decide between the 2. Hi Gordon, thanks for sharing these pictures with us. The majority of bullet weights used for the 7mm rem mag rounds for hunting purposes fall between 150 and 180gr though there are outliers of lighter and heavier bullets. blog) by 20 percent. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Many target shooters found this to be detrimental to extreme accuracy. As the 7mm Rem Mag is of smaller caliber than the 300 Win Mag, it is a very good choice for lighter, smaller animals. Get the American Hunter Insider newsletter for at-a-glance access to industry news, gear, gun reviews, videos and more—delivered directly to your Inbox. Back then I had a case based on the 8X68S case. Mag. No Reproduction Permitted Without Permission. I have For me it would be a 300 win or 7 rm. Just love this, Vedauwoo, Wyoming is my favorite climbing area and we saw Momma Moose first really far away, then we saw baby. 7mm Remington Magnum vs 300 Winchester Short Magnum Both of these calibers are excellent moose cartridges. Some might agree the 7mm mag may be alittle flatter shooting if range is an issue but with either gun the projectile makes all the difference in range and energy. I also like and have had the 300 WM and the 300 RUM. However, the distance from the case head to the datum line on the shoulder is longer for the 7WSM, preventing accidental chambering or firing of the .284" 7mm bullet in .270 WSM's .277" bore. I have thought about cooking it but didn't know how. But the 300 WSM is … I actually have the 7mm saum chambered in a savage lrp with ptg magnum SA boltface. Mag. There can be no doubt that both are outstanding rifle cartridges. Using a fat, 404 Jeffery case 2.850" long with the 30-degree shoulder pushed well forward, Remington engineers were able to beat the case capacity of the 300 Wby. If you handload, you can get load your 280 to within 75-100 fps or so of the 7mm WSM. vs. .300 Win. The differences between the 7mm Rem Magnum and the .300 Winchester Magnum rounds are shown in the table above. SAUM vs WSM. morning Mark, I want to thank you again for your outstanding service. Abnormal, We awoke this morning January 1, 2021 to this beautiful baby moose in our backyard. 7mm WSM/SAUM Pros: Rockstar ballistics (quite a bit less drop and wind deflection out to a mile than the .300 wm) with less felt recoil(I'd love to have extended range sessions), DTA offers a conversion for 7wsm but it appears that brass may have dried up for it?? It's pretty close to the 280 Ackley and since you're a reloader, obtaining ammo won't be an issue. Used it for many years but finally got tired of the recoil. 7mm rem mag vs 300 wsm Hey fellas, Currebtly looking into calibres for a long range rig I wana invest in for my next rifle. 7mm rem mag vs 300 wsm Hey fellas, Currebtly looking into calibres for a long range rig I wana invest in for my next rifle. Mag load (168 Berger Classic Hunter) at 500 yards while only giving up 200 ft-lbs of energy (1700 vs. 1900) at the same distance. The math works out that this gun will produce a five-inch flatter trajectory over my 7mm Rem. And lets not forget the 300 H&H, .308 Norma, 30 Nosler, 300 PRC, and all the rest. If I was limited to one gun for deer and elk in the west the WSM you are suggesting would be about perfect. I have shot most of my stuff with a .300 Win mag and it has never failed me. Mag. Rifle wise I'm looking at Browning X bolt hells canyon, Howa Stainless, maybe a Sako but they're pricey, or maybe even a Sauer. Mag. Does the perfect muley cartridge really exist? Mag. which cal would be best ? We are going to park the quads this year and use the boat, get away from the others. It would start with the .308 Winchester, then the .30-06, .300 Win. We decided to stay on the far side of the, Copyright© 2010- | All-About-Moose.com | All Rights Reserved (which you can read all about on this 7mm vs. 300 Win. Recoil of the 300 WSM should be pretty much the same as the 300 Win Mag. The.300 Win Mag and 7mm Rem Mag cartridges hit the market around the same time and are both hugely popular in the hunting and shooting communities. The increase in length of the .300 WM over the .300 WSM is greater than the increased wideness of the case of the .300 WSM. Definitely the 7mm. It's easy to do. The 7mm-300 wsm is a wildcat with a slightly longer neck favoured by target shooters. the 7mm has a higher Ballistic coefficent, which means better long range accuracy but we're talking 400-500 yards before it makes a great difference. I also have a .300 Wthby in a Rem 700, but I don't think it provides much real advantage over the Win version. Thank you It uses a bit less powder to get the job done and is reputed to have better accuracy and barrel life but thats just what i heard. Violate this principle by, for example, chambering a lightweight, short action rifle for a powerful Magnum cartridge like the .300 WSM and the result will be a dramatic increase in kick. Mag. Magnum, .300 WSM and .300 Ultra Mag. learned so much from this site. However, Winchester likely made an attempt at doing just that, but since the case is optimized for the 300 WSM, they probably were not getting the desired performance with a .338″ bullet and opted for a .323″ compromise instead. Lbs.) Remington released their 7mm and .300 short action ultra magnums in the same year and a year later, Winchester released the 7mm and .270 WSM cartridges. 7mm vs 300 WSM? We are now offering customized moose shape keychains. Thank you so much for having such wonderful ways to fix moose. Perfect size but getting brass was hit or miss. Tikka T3 Lite is what I am thinking, just not sure on the size 7mm or 300wsm. So I suppose its what you what to with it. Argue with me all you want but this has been my experience with both rounds. 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag. Same weight bullet, same velocity = same recoil. The 7mm WSM is similar to the .300 WSM with the case necked down to handle .284" bullets. I have been looking at the .300 WSM, but the old 7mm shoots so flat it's hard to change. I currently have hunting and target rifles in .308, 30-06, 300 WSM, and 300 Ack. You The heaviest I went with my 7mm WSM was a 168gr berger classic hunter that basically needed to be loaded out to max SAAMI. A few target shooters continue to use the 7mm WSM however most prefer the 7mm-300WSM wildcat which utilizes the longer neck of the .300 WSM case design. A battery of two guns on either side of the .30-06 would be probably be versatile and effective. vs. 7mm Rem. Performance The 7mm WSM delivers best performance when loaded with 140 to 162 grain bullets. Not sure where the 7mm is headed, although it is probably the best of the WSM's at least on paper. How rare is this find? Long Range Trajectory. The 300 WSM can shoot heavier bullets, faster, flatter, less wind drift, more accurately and with less recoil than the 7mm Rem. Have you ever considered the 270 WSM? I live in south florida and hunt whitetail and wild boar, it is flat open grassland with dense palmetto oak and cypress heads. The only ballistic redundancy is the .300 Win./.300 WSM, but for the same reason as described with the 7mms, I would include them in my lineup. I need to take the word from Paul Harvey---"to close to call". Truly appreciate you watching the videos!Milk jugs with these two power houses!! RE: 300 WSM Vs 7mm Rem Mag Which is better for big game Both great for big game. vs. .300 Win. Even better for target, is the 7mm saum. i shoot a custom 7mm wsm and am shooting 168 bergerts with a bc of .64. i also kave a 300 mag i am shooting 168 bergers through it as well they had a bc of .46. so you tell me why you guys think that they are so much flatter and with less wind drift. I found a moose skull in North Idaho. The math works out that this gun will produce a five-inch flatter trajectory over my 7mm Rem. Mule Deer Cartridge Showdown: .270 Win. Its got history, the 300 WSM has been around for about 5 years or so. Open to any opinion on size and make.Thanks. Mag. Furthermore, the muzzle energy of a.300 WSM Winchester Short Magnum round averages out to 3580 ft-lb, while a 7mm-08 Remington round averages out to about 2450 ft-lb. Instead, your advantage is going to be achieved by selecting from individual rounds and both the .300 WM and the 7mm RM have rounds with phenomenal trajectories. It's pretty close to the 280 Ackley and since you're a reloader, obtaining ammo won't be an issue. A 300 SAUM-Ackley might shave a couple grains off a WSM load while achieving the same speed, but that seems like a poor tradeoff when you need to buy all custom (dies, reamer) and fireform to get going when compared to a WSM with off the shelf stuff everywhere ready to go. We put 3 popular cartridges to a head-to-head-to-head test That said I would not build a 30 cal for the application @topclass2017 mentions. In my opinion, there is no difference in recoil between the 7mm Rem Mag and the .300 Win Mag. The 225 ELD-M's help manage that over capacity issue. Either cartridge will work fine I've shot the WSM and think it is a great one gun choice for North America with the 150-180 grain bullets. Remington released their 7mm and .300 short action ultra magnums in the same year and a year later, Winchester released the 7mm and .270 WSM cartridges. Been a 7mm lover most of that time. It fits actions designed for 30-06-length cartridges. good luck. The 7mm-300 wsm is a wildcat with a slightly longer neck favoured by target shooters. Simply click here to return to Hunting Rifle. Good The .300 WSM also head-spaces off of the case shoulder, versus the older .300 Winchester Magnum's belted head space design. Even so, they have different strengths and weaknesses and the 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag debate is still going strong over 50 years later. would have it, when I arrived home after work yesterday the moose call was in One way to think about this is as such: a foot-pound is a unit of energy equal to the amount of energy required to raise a weight of one pound a distance of one foot. The fact that it also has a milder recoil than the 300 Win Mag makes the 7mm Rem Mag a sound choice for those heading out on mountain hunting expeditions. I have owned a Remington 7mm mag rifle(s) and used it almost exclusively for hunting deer, elk and moose since 1968. The 7mm is a belted cartridge and the 300wsm is a rimmed cartridge. As you can see, this projectile is over a millimeter larger in diameter, and the cartridge is a good big longer as well. Our cat Maxi was very curious. You need to long-throat (single-feed) both the 7 and the 300 WSMs. I have been shooting and hunting for more than 50 years and have had a lot of different calibers. I LOVE 30 cal. Dale emailed us:Cool website, nice to see others that consider the moose as a majestic creature. Here are some specifications of interest to those reloading the 7mm WSM cartridge: bullet diameter .284", maximum COL 2.860", maximum case length 2.100". vs. 7mm Rem. I want to buy a large cal rifle capable of 400 yard knockdown power and 500+ yard target accuracy without excessive recoil. I'm not the best shot but can hold my own. Will let you know if it is a successful hunt. You are using an out of date browser. your site and how much I appreciate all the help you give everyone. Just my opinion. used the 7mm alot from the 80s and for me it was a pretty hard kicker not much less than a .300 Win Mag. have a great way with words and make this site very approachable for new This addition to the family would be for Elk and long range groundhogs. But can't decide between the 2. In our opinion, both sides of the 7mm Rem Mag vs. 300 Win Mag fence offers comfortable, efficient ‘seating’! Laurie wrote to us:"I just wanted to let you know how much I love The differences between the 7mm Rem Magnum and the .300 Winchester Magnum rounds are shown in the table above. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .270 WSM Winchester Short Magnum vs .300 Winchester Magnum ammo rounds. 300 Savage 7mm-08 Rem 260 Rem 6.5x284 Norma 284 Win 338 Fed 358 Win 250 Savage Short actions with a bolt face of .540" 7mm RSAUM 6.5 RSAUM 300 RSAUM 300 WSM.270 WSM 6.5 WSM 7mm WSM 223 WSSM 243 WSSM 25 WSSM 350 Rem Mag Long actions with a bolt face of .470" 30-06 Springfield 270 Win 220 Swift 240 Weatherby 257 Roberts 25-06 Rem 338_06 … Truly appreciate you watching the videos!Cinder blocks with these two power houses!! Have you ever considered the 270 WSM? Looking at the recoil of the .300 Win Mag vs .300 WSM is important for understanding certain situations that you might favor one over the other. And lets not forget the 300 H&H, .308 Norma, 30 Nosler, 300 PRC, and all the rest. not just the novice in mind, there are tips in the book that even the Just because it can be done does not mean it makes sense, despite what you might read in advertising copy. IMO The 300 WSM will have a longer throat life, if you are doing a lot of back to back shooting. The 7mm Rem Mag is a flat shooting round that is available in a good selection of bullet weights, though maybe not as many as the.300 Win Mag. The 30 BooBoo. We are now offering customized moose shape keychains. Look no further!Our moose hunting tips book is written with eclipse: where did you get data that the 300wsm is flatter than the 7rm at 500 yards. Rifle wise I'm looking at Browning X bolt hells canyon, Howa Stainless, maybe a Sako but they're pricey, or maybe even a Sauer. I also like and have had the 300 WM and the 300 RUM. As well as our in-depth look at the 7mm Remmington Magnum. RE: 300 WSM Vs 7mm Rem Mag Which is better for big game A comparison of the 150gr Nosler Balistic tips in both calibers (from the Federal Website): The .300 WSM starts with a 225 fps advantage and about 500 ft lbs of energy ( at the muzzle) -Which isconsiderable. That said I would not build a 30 cal for the application @topclass2017 mentions. I LOVE 30 cal. Recoil of the 300 WSM should be pretty much the same as the 300 Win Mag. Im only planning on chasing deer sized game for 2021 so there's not much of a rush. One was a moose steak. A 300 WSM on a LA sounds like an option but I am a little ways from that build. I have just never been thrilled by the 7mm Rem Mag. They got on quite well. Ballistics Comparison for 270 That said, among the WSM cartridge line, the.300 seems to be the only one maintaining a serious presence; even the.270 WSM is falling off considerably, and the 7mm and.325 WSMs are apparently down for the count. Join in and write your own page! The 7mm Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) was designed in 2001 by Winchester Repeating Arms Company and Browning Arms Company. can use bullets of 120 grains, but things usually top out at 175 or 185 grains. Firstly, both rounds are belted mags based on the .375 H&H Magnum cases. the 7mm has a higher Ballistic coefficent, which means better long range accuracy but we're talking 400-500 yards before it makes a great difference. The 300 WSM can shoot heavier bullets, faster, flatter, less wind drift, more accurately and with less recoil than the 7mm Rem. The increase in length of the .300 WM over the .300 WSM is greater than the increased wideness of the case of the .300 WSM. hunters and very informative for both new and veteran hunters alike. With comparable bullet weights, the 7mm Mag. Hodgdon reloading data for the 7mm WSM shows that the 140 grain Nosler Partition spitzer bullet can be driven to a MV of 2979 fps in front of 58.0 grains of H4350 powder. Simple, clean, yet every rung on the performance ladder is represented. JavaScript is disabled. Re: 300 WSM or 7mm WSM +1 what Steve said. Just my two cents, the 7mm rem is a belted magnum versus the 300wsm which is a rimmed cartridge. Im only planning on chasing deer sized game for 2021 so there's not much of a rush. if you like a 7mm shoot it, you can get 180 berger vlds and get even more bc, my gun just likes 168 pushed 3075 fps. It's easy to do. Many target shooters found this to be detrimental to extreme accuracy. Think, pronghorn, mule, and fallow deer. 6.5 Creedmoor vs .300 Winchester Magnum… However, the distance from the case head to the datum line on the shoulder is longer for the 7WSM, preventing accidental chambering or firing of the .284" 7mm bullet in .270 WSM's .277" bore. I currently have both a 700 Remington and a M77 Ruger type rifles. 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag – Comparing Cartridge Sizes. The book includes 57 chapters, with more than 150 pages of information, jam packed with tips, techniques and discussions - The Ultimate Guide to Moose Hunting! Either will neatly terminate deer, sheep, elk and larger game so long at the shooter delivers the right bullet to the right spot. How? But, the success of the release of the .300 WSM yielded the subsequent release of the .270, 7mm and .325 WSM cartridges. Information Outfitters - equipping you with over fifty years of outdoors experience! On the other hand, the .300 Winchester Magnum has a slightly longer case length (2.62″ vs 2.5″) as well as a shoulder that sits .156″ further forward than the shoulder of the 7mm Rem Mag. Join in and write your own page! by 13 percent and the Win. The .300 Magnum would be better on the biggest game than the top four and the 7mm-08 would be just about ideal for the smaller big game with less recoil than the top four. It uses a bit less powder to get the job done and is reputed to have better accuracy and barrel life but thats just what i heard. We put 3 popular cartridges to a head-to-head-to-head test It has two paddles on each side. Manya from Tampa Bay said: My sister-in-law came down with a box of goodies from Alaska. Put your favourite caliber, rifle make or saying on it. The .300 Winchester Magnum has a case capacity of 93.8 grains of H2O. How? The .300 WSM was the first of Winchesters short magnum family, released in 2001. Firstly, both rounds are belted mags based on the .375 H&H Magnum cases. In another 20 years the 300 WSM will surpass the 300 Win Mag in sales, maybe sooner. RE: 300 WSM Vs 7mm Rem Mag Which is better for big game A comparison of the 150gr Nosler Balistic tips in both calibers (from the Federal Website): The .300 WSM starts with a 225 fps advantage and about 500 ft lbs of energy ( at the muzzle) -Which isconsiderable. Mag. As outlined above, there have been a variety of potent 6.5 cartridges over the years with the 264 Win Mag dating as far back as 1958, and the 6.5 Rem Mag in 1966. Always remember that the guy shooting the rifle is far less accurate than the gun. my mail box. Mag load (168 Berger Classic Hunter) at 500 yards while only giving up 200 ft-lbs of energy (1700 vs. 1900) at the same distance. Performance The 7mm WSM delivers best performance when loaded with 140 to 162 grain bullets. Does the perfect muley cartridge really exist? Both rifles work equally as well. The case is based off a .300 WSM with a narrowed neck to fit .284 inch bullets on a .321 inch neck and the parent case is the .404 Jeffery. To engage this 7mm RM vs. 300 WM argument you have to be willing to pick at nits because, bottom line, both cartridges (and many other magnums like them) are winners. Among the.300s, when you look at the dimensions of the two cases, it seriously boils down to nothing more than a popularity contest. A 7mm-08 and a .300 Magnum might be an example of such a two rifle battery. Using a 180 berger a 7rm is way flatter than the 300. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. A couple of years ago I helped my son build a 300 WSM and I so impressed that I had to have one myself. Currently I am shooting an older 7mm REM in need of an upgrade. 7mm Remington Magnum vs 300 Winchester Short Magnum. I actually have the 7mm saum chambered in a savage lrp with ptg magnum SA boltface. Hot on the heels of the .300 WSM, Remington countered with the .300 Remington Short Action Ultra Magnum—or RSAUM for short—based on a shortened version of their 1999 .300 Remington Ultra Magnum cartridge. Its got history, the 300 WSM has been around for about 5 years or so. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufact As far as the discussion between the 300 short mag and the 7mm mag I think you are splitting hairs. 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag Conclusion. A 300 WSM on a LA sounds like an option but I am a little ways from that build. While providing ballistic performance nearly identical to that of the .300 Winchester Magnum, .300 WSM does this with about 14 grains less powder. But the 300 WSM … Argue with me all you want but this has been my experience with both rounds. As luck most seasoned moose hunter will find of value. Caliber: Bullet Weight: Overall Cartridge Length: Muzzle Velocity: Trajectory at 300 yds(100yds zero) Muzzle Energy(Ft. Mule Deer Cartridge Showdown: .270 Win. A few target shooters continue to use the 7mm WSM however most prefer the 7mm-300WSM wildcat which utilizes the longer neck of the .300 WSM case design. The 7mm WSM is similar to the .300 WSM with the case necked down to handle .284" bullets. Again, it's a fantastic site, keep up the great work.". Simply click here to return to. Looking at the recoil of the .300 Win Mag vs .300 WSM is important for understanding certain situations that you might favor one over the other. The 7mm rem is a long action versus the 300wsm which is a short, is that a consideration. On the other hand, the .300 Winchester Magnum has a slightly longer case length (2.62″ vs 2.5″) as well as a shoulder that sits .156″ further forward than the shoulder of the 7mm Rem Mag. Mag. Add text to both sides!It's also a bottle opener! I bought one of the first Remington 7mm Mag in the early 60's and loved it. The belted cartridge is not going to be quite as accurate as a rimmed cartridge by design. Downrange the 300wsm hits hard closer and downrange while the 7mm rem flies faster and flatter. The 7mm has been around since the 60s and has killed 1000s of big game animals all over North America. It figures when the Postal Circus is involved.Ed. It is my go to guide for moose hunting. The 300 Win. 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag – Comparing Cartridge Sizes. Tikk T3 Lite A fine choice for a Moose HUnting Rifle, New to hunting, won a moose draw in BC. I am getting to the opinion that BC is BS!! which has more killing power to kill bear,boar,panther, an possibly polar bear an what manufacturer makes one between $250-500 with scope if possible thanks an happy hunting I stay away from the wsm's and there's not really any proof that there is a benefit to them. I looked on your site. Even better for target, is the 7mm saum. The 175 grain bullet worked well on Elk and caribou for me. The .300 WSM was the first of Winchesters short magnum family, released in 2001. ? Mag. The 7mm has been around since the 60s and has killed 1000s of big game animals all over North America. This is where the WSM shines. I went back to the .308 until I went to Africa again in late 90s and then 2004. in 99 I took a .300 Weatherby and a .375 Weatherby. is a classic “standard-length” cartridge based on the belted 375 H&H Magnum case. Let’s step out and take a look at the trajectories of the 7mm Rem Mag vs .300 … The WSM chamberings are proving to be slightly more accurate as well. Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. 300 Winchester Magnum .300 Win Mag projectiles are 7.8mm in diameter, and the cartridge is 3.34 inches long. The photo below does a great job of showing the differences in external … 300 Savage 7mm-08 Rem 260 Rem 6.5x284 Norma 284 Win 338 Fed 358 Win 250 Savage Short actions with a bolt face of .540" 7mm RSAUM 6.5 RSAUM 300 RSAUM 300 WSM.270 WSM 6.5 WSM 7mm WSM 223 WSSM 243 WSSM 25 WSSM 350 Rem Mag Long actions with a bolt face of .470" 30-06 Springfield 270 Win 220 Swift 240 Weatherby 257 Roberts 25-06 Rem 338_06 7x57 Mauser The short, fat 300 WSM, released on an unsuspecting public in the second year of the 21st century, boosts that slightly to 3,010 fps and 3,621 f-p. Want to learn how to hunt moose? Add text to both sides. Violate this principle by, for example, chambering a lightweight, short action rifle for a powerful Magnum cartridge like the .300 WSM and the result will be a dramatic increase in kick. I currently have hunting and target rifles in .308, 30-06, 300 WSM, and 300 Ack. Mag. If you run them at short mag lengths, they both suffer greatly. When we started using the then 300 HSM, we knew the capacity was more than we wanted/needed for pure accuracy work but it was a simple solution. The 300 WSM, for example, has gained widespread popularity while the 7WSM has essentially become obsolete. Just because it can be done does not mean it makes sense, despite what you might read in advertising copy. This longer cartridge requires a longer action.